The attorneys of KM begin every case with the end in mind. We have represented numerous clients before federal and state administrative bodies and this depth of appellate experience provides clients with more efficient and effective counsel on a number of levels. KM's appellate experience benefits the clients in 2 ways, it removes the need for an additional expense of an appellate "expert" who is unfamiliar with the underlying proceedings and it enables trial attorney to litigate the matter with an eye on protecting the client on a potential appeal. Quite simply, the best of both worlds!
Some of our representative matters that have resulted in appellate opinions include:
- Bd. of Comm'rs. v. Town of Plainfield, 909 N.E.2d 480 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
- Johnson County Rural Elec. Mbrshp. Corp. v. South Cent. Ind. Rural Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 883 N.E.2d 141 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
- Keesling v. T.E.K. Partners, LLC, 881 N.E.2d 1025 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
- Fuehrer v. Storm, 737 N.E.2d 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000).
- Sweet v. Art Pape Transfer, Inc., 721 N.E.2d 311 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
- North Side Serv. Center, Inc. v. Kulwin, Case No. 49A02-0609-CV-792, 2007 WL 2769637 (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 25, 2007).
- Perry v. Madison Acquisition, LLC, Case No. 49A02-0610-CV-863, 2007 WL 2363654 (Ind. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2007).
- Goar & Sons, Inc. v. Lakes, No. 29A02-0006-cv-00365 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2001).
KM understands the significant investment--both financial and professional-- that every appeal presents for its client. Our attorneys are prepared to help you navigate the appeals process in a cost-effective manner tailored to your particular appellate and business needs.